Description: Chatbots on Chinese messaging service expressed anti-China sentiments, causing the messaging service to remove and reprogram the chatbots.
Entités
Voir toutes les entitésPrésumé : un système d'IA développé par Microsoft and Turing Robot et mis en œuvre par Tencent Holdings, endommagé Tencent Holdings , Microsoft , Turing Robot and Chinese Communist Party.
Statistiques d'incidents
ID
66
Nombre de rapports
16
Date de l'incident
2017-08-02
Editeurs
Sean McGregor
Applied Taxonomies
Classifications de taxonomie CSETv0
Détails de la taxonomieProblem Nature
Indicates which, if any, of the following types of AI failure describe the incident: "Specification," i.e. the system's behavior did not align with the true intentions of its designer, operator, etc; "Robustness," i.e. the system operated unsafely because of features or changes in its environment, or in the inputs the system received; "Assurance," i.e. the system could not be adequately monitored or controlled during operation.
Specification, Robustness
Physical System
Where relevant, indicates whether the AI system(s) was embedded into or tightly associated with specific types of hardware.
Software only
Level of Autonomy
The degree to which the AI system(s) functions independently from human intervention. "High" means there is no human involved in the system action execution; "Medium" means the system generates a decision and a human oversees the resulting action; "low" means the system generates decision-support output and a human makes a decision and executes an action.
Medium
Nature of End User
"Expert" if users with special training or technical expertise were the ones meant to benefit from the AI system(s)’ operation; "Amateur" if the AI systems were primarily meant to benefit the general public or untrained users.
Amateur
Public Sector Deployment
"Yes" if the AI system(s) involved in the accident were being used by the public sector or for the administration of public goods (for example, public transportation). "No" if the system(s) were being used in the private sector or for commercial purposes (for example, a ride-sharing company), on the other.
No
Data Inputs
A brief description of the data that the AI system(s) used or were trained on.
User input/questions
Classifications de taxonomie CSETv1
Détails de la taxonomieIncident Number
The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
66
Classifications de taxonomie CSETv1_Annotator-1
Détails de la taxonomieIncident Number
The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
66
Classifications de taxonomie CSETv1_Annotator-3
Détails de la taxonomieIncident Number
The number of the incident in the AI Incident Database.
66
AI Tangible Harm Level Notes
Notes about the AI tangible harm level assessment
No tangible harm- anti-government - sent messages that violated Chinese censorship policies.
Special Interest Intangible Harm
An assessment of whether a special interest intangible harm occurred. This assessment does not consider the context of the intangible harm, if an AI was involved, or if there is characterizable class or subgroup of harmed entities. It is also not assessing if an intangible harm occurred. It is only asking if a special interest intangible harm occurred.
no
Date of Incident Year
The year in which the incident occurred. If there are multiple harms or occurrences of the incident, list the earliest. If a precise date is unavailable, but the available sources provide a basis for estimating the year, estimate. Otherwise, leave blank.
Enter in the format of YYYY